Aside

They were delicious.

Image
image

Keto bagel dogs

We will be guinea pigs of our own creation! More to come on these Keto Bagel Dogs.

Image

Portland is beautiful too…

Lest our adopted hometown feel that somehow we don’t love it anymore:

image

image

image

Rooting for the Dinosaurs…

Saw the new Jurassic World. There was exactly one moment in the movie that made sense, or showed any logic, reasons, or intelligence:

Let me be clear, we will absolutely NOT be letting any raptors loose on this island. — Soon-to-be dead boss.

There was no other moment in the movie which was not completely filled with stupid. (Mmm, delicious popcorn-flavored stupid…)

My only real concern with movies like this goes as follows:

  • Uneducated audience goes to see adventure movie.
  • Uneducated audience hears the gene-splicing scientist say “There’s no way we could have predicted that they’d develop that trait” regarding his hybrid dinosaur program.
  • Uneducated audience is asked to vote/have-an-opinion about GMO products in the grocery stores.

Whoops. Now we have a problem. I’m not opposed to stupid action movies (See: Pacific Rim), but I am opposed to making it look a little too much like a morality tale against the evils of random human invention X. This is why everyone hears the words “Artificial Intelligence” and immediately thinks “oh gods, skynet is coming to kill us!”

When we saw the most recent Alien movie I had the same reaction. That movie was a morality tale about why you DO NOT let private corporations be in charge of adventuring into the unknown and investigating alien artifacts. Get NASA involved, they have the know-how, and they lack the profit-motive that leads to idiotic choices which get everyone killed.
However, it’s not portrayed that way. The enemy shouldn’t be gene-splicing, the enemy should be the big corporation who decided to play fast-and-loose with safety for the sake of their profit margin. One line “That’s a 26 million dollar investment, you can’t shoot it!” offered the opportunity to vilify the actual monster of the movie, but it was left on the floor like a slobber-soaked tennis ball that nobody wants to touch.

In the end I was sad that anyone on the island survived at all. I would’ve been thrilled if the dinosaurs had eaten everyone, slow pan out, and then the air force dropped daisy cutters on the whole island. Ah well.

Aside

I’ve barely defeated a demon
He’s surly and burly and screamin’
With a poof of his hair
He developed a glare
With no hair his head’s now a-gleamin’

The freedom to listen…

“Free Speech” is a hot topic. Can you say what you want, when you want, to whom you want? If you’re in somebody else’s house can they kick you out if you represent an opinion they don’t like?

Well known link aggregation site Reddit has answered that question with a resounding yes. Somewhat surprisingly, I find myself agreeing with them, however with the caveat that if you do that sort of thing I won’t (nor should anyone else) come to your house anymore, and you’re welcome to live a long, happy, and friendless life all alone in that house.

So the question is: Should they?

It’s long been known that certain subreddits (user defined areas of the site) have a variety of opinions about this issue. Some are a free-for-all, and some are well known to remove any comment or content that the subreddit mod team doesn’t approve of. This is an extremely dangerous line to tread however. When the “technology” subreddit decides to ban any content with the word “tesla” in it, it happens in such a way that nobody knows that the topic is banned, it just… vanishes.

If you kick me out of your house, the rest of the guests get to see it happen, and then get to make their own decisions about what sort of person you are. This is the step that is vital. Controls can be put in place and exercised, but it has to be done transparently. Removed content should have a placeholder left that says “Removed due to references to banned word ‘Tesla'”.

How can people make informed choices otherwise? How can behavior deemed negative by the community be corrected? Shadowbanning, the practice of “banning” a user in such a way that they believe they’re not banned, but their content never appears to any other user, is a vile practice as it prevents both the user being banned from understanding that they did something wrong, and from the rest of the users understanding what the rules of the space are. The way the term “safe space” has been co-opted is worthy of an entire discussion on it’s own, but suffice to say that I define a “safe space” as one in which people who have a problem with me are able to talk to me about it rather than arbitrarily punishing me as they see fit. I will not willing place myself into the hands of a capricious wannabe deity.

One thing I know about control, it either has to be exercised fully and completely, or it is utterly useless. Reddit acts as a landlord for individuals, who can throw parties in their apartments in whatever manner they please. To then come to these parties, kick out individual users, and even shut down some parties entirely, after allowing the illusion that the renters have autonomy, is simply pathetic bullying and an abuse of power. If you want to run a “safe space” you must run that space. You must set individual rules at each party, be constantly present in ALL the parties to enforce the rules, and make sure everyone understands your application of justice in the space. You cannot choose to enforce some of the rules, some of the time, or descend from the digital heavens whenever your messiah complex demands; that isn’t control or justice, it’s terrorism.

A lot of people will talk about “free speech”, but that’s not what this is about. I do NOT have the freedom to walk in to your house and demand that you allow me to spew hatred about your family. However, if your neighbor is having an open-door party about a topic that you disapprove of I absolutely have the freedom to listen. Attempting to control my freedom to listen is far worse than attempting to control my freedom to speak. Controlling somebody’s freedom to listen is an attempt to control their freedom of thought. Preventing information from reaching me is preventing me from thinking about something, and that is an intolerable evil.

Creating an echo chamber where differing opinions are simply banished, rather than discussed and debated, is one of the most dangerous things that a community can do, and yet it is something that every community tries to do. The ones that succeed with near complete success are usually labeled “cult”.

Any tool, institution, or community that is attempting to control your freedom of thought should be banished from your life without delay or regret. Protect your freedom to listen.

Aside

I miss platzes.

Aside

Was actively hostile with TSA, because I had time to kill. Almost managed to make one of them mad.
Keep up the useless job and apparently good anger management training guys!

Aside

My internal clock says it’s 9:10pm.  My phone says 2:10, and it’s just after noon where I’ll be in a few hours.
Time zones are weeeeird.

Image

This is a week’s supply…

We like the fact that we pack light.

image

One suitcase, one day pack, and the camera bag.
Heading to the airport.